Is a Mini PC Good for Gaming? Honest Answer (2026)

Disclosure: Some links in this article are affiliate links. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

Ask whether a mini PC is good for gaming and you get two answers that both sound right. One comes from an owner whose entry-level Intel N100 box stutters through a modern AAA release; the other comes from a Radeon 780M user running Fortnite at 76 fps on integrated graphics. Neither is lying. The disagreement is about graphics tiers, not about mini PCs, and two systems in near-identical chassis can differ severalfold in gaming capability — which is why the best mini PCs for gaming are sorted by GPU rather than by size or CPU.

The labels buyers reach for are the least useful. A mini PC with a Core i9-13900H and Iris Xe graphics loses to a Ryzen 7 8845HS with Radeon 780M in essentially every modern title, despite the higher-tier CPU name. A machine advertising 8K display output can render a demanding game at 24 fps. And a 32 GB N100 system remains a single-channel platform that more memory cannot turn into a gaming machine.

The useful way to sort this market is by what actually renders frames: the integrated or discrete GPU, the memory bandwidth feeding it, and the sustained power its cooling can hold. That sorting also explains the memory rule most buyers break, why output specifications are not rendering performance, how OCuLink and USB4 external GPUs change the picture, and where a handheld or a console is the more rational purchase.

For anyone deciding whether to buy a mini PC as a gaming machine, or to combine compact gaming with general desktop work, the short answer comes before the reasoning: a mini PC games well when its GPU tier matches your library, and the tier table is the fastest way to find yours.

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Mini PC Gaming Tiers at a Glance

The Short Answer: It Depends Entirely on the GPU Tier

A mini PC is a good gaming machine when its graphics tier matches the games you play, and a poor one when it does not. That resolves into three practical groups.

• Radeon 780M and 890M systems are legitimate 1080p gaming computers. They run esports and optimized multiplayer titles at high frame rates, older AAA games comfortably, and current demanding titles at low to medium settings with upscaling.
• Intel UHD (N100 / N150) systems are not modern gaming machines. They are excellent low-power servers, office PCs and emulation and streaming clients that happen to launch games.
• Systems with an OCuLink connection, a working USB4 or Thunderbolt eGPU path, or an integrated laptop discrete GPU sit in a different class — one that can approach desktop-GPU gaming.

The single most useful threshold is Radeon 780M. Below it, gaming is a compromise you justify game by game. At it, a mini PC becomes a credible general-purpose 1080p computer, with Cyberpunk 2077 in the high-30-fps range at 1080p Low and lighter titles well above 60 fps. Above it, Radeon 890M raises the ceiling without crossing into discrete-GPU territory: an 890M system measured 74 fps in GTA V at 1080p High but only 24.7 fps in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p Ultra with no upscaling — exactly the profile of a strong integrated GPU rather than a graphics card.

How to Read a Mini PC's Gaming Specs

GPU architecture and shader count

A mini PC's frame rate is set first by its graphics processor — its architecture generation and how many compute or execution units it carries. The generational gaps are wide enough to override pricing and CPU tier. Radeon 680M's 12 RDNA 2 compute units, Radeon 780M's 12 RDNA 3 units and Radeon 890M's 16 RDNA 3.5 units are three distinct performance classes despite overlapping names, and Intel's own lineup spans 24 execution units in an N100, up to 96 in an Iris Xe part, and an Arc configuration equivalent to roughly 112–128 execution units. Read the GPU before anything else on the page.

Memory bandwidth and channel count

An integrated GPU has no dedicated video memory. It reads textures, frame buffers and game data across the same system memory bus as the CPU, which makes memory bandwidth a direct performance input rather than a background detail. A single DDR5-5600 channel moves about 44.8 GB/s; two populated channels move roughly 89.6 GB/s. Leaving one channel empty caps the GPU at half the bandwidth the platform can supply, and in this class that costs more frame rate than any CPU upgrade.

Sustained power, not peak power

APUs in mini PCs share one package power budget between CPU and GPU, so a game loading both stretches the same thermal and electrical envelope. What matters is the power a system holds for an hour, not the boost captured in the first thirty seconds. A 65 W label and a 55 W measured sustained draw describe different machines when the second one holds its clocks and the first drops them.

Cooling and acoustics

Cooling determines how much of that power budget survives a long session. A 1-litre chassis has limited surface area and airflow, so the same APU performs differently depending on the cooler around it. Measured noise is the practical readout: well-designed Radeon 780M and 890M systems sit in the low-to-mid 30s dBA under sustained load, while a machine peaking near 89 °C is working its thermal solution harder than a quieter competitor.

What the spec sheet overstates

Three specifications carry far less weight than vendors imply. Display output (4K120, 8K60) describes the link, not rendering. RAM capacity above roughly 32 GB does not raise frame rate when games already fit in memory. And a premium CPU name — a Core i9-13900H, for instance — does not guarantee better gaming than a newer Ryzen 7 with Radeon 780M, because the graphics silicon decides the outcome.

The Mini PC Gaming Tiers, From Retro to Credible

Intel UHD (N100 / N150) — Retro, Emulation and Streaming

The Intel N100 pairs four efficiency cores with a 24-execution-unit UHD graphics engine running up to 750 MHz, on a platform with a single memory channel and a 6 W processor base power. The N150 keeps the same 24 EUs but lifts the graphics clock to 1.0 GHz. These are thin-client and always-on-server specifications, and it shows the moment a game asks for more than a light workload.

Reference points make the ceiling concrete. Benchmark databases put GTA V at roughly 42 fps at 1366×768 on Normal but only single-digit frame rates at substantially heavier 1080p settings, and The Witcher 3 in the low-20-fps range at 1024×768 on Low. That profile — fine at low resolution on older or lightweight games, collapsing under modern 1080p loads — is exactly what retro gaming, emulation, game streaming and casual esports need, and nothing more.

The critical buying fact is structural: the N100 exposes only one memory channel, so no RAM configuration turns it into a dual-channel graphics platform. A vendor advertising 32 GB of DDR4 or DDR5 on an N100 box cannot change the processor's memory controller, and 32 GB exceeds Intel's own documented 16 GB maximum for the chip. Adding memory to an N100 mini PC does not buy frame rate.

The GMKtec NucBox G3 is a representative example — Check Price on Amazon — and it is the right kind of machine for a low-power home server or an emulation front end. It is the wrong kind for a primary gaming goal; the N100 buying guide covers which roles the platform genuinely suits.

Intel Iris Xe — Older AAA at Reduced Settings

Intel's Iris Xe generation, as found in Core i9-13900H-class mini PCs, can carry up to 96 execution units — several times the N100's graphics resources — and remains a dated but usable path for older AAA titles and esports at reduced settings. The catch is that the CPU badge oversells it. A GEEKOM GT13 Pro with a Core i9-13900H sounds like a gaming machine, and independent reviews treat its Iris Xe graphics as inadequate for demanding modern games compared with current Radeon 780M mini PCs.

This tier exists mainly as a warning about buying on CPU names. A high-end Intel mobile CPU with integrated Iris Xe does not out-game a current Ryzen 7 with Radeon 780M. If Iris Xe is what a listing offers, treat it as a productivity system that can play older games: Check Price on Amazon.

Intel Arc (Meteor Lake) — Entry 1080p

Core Ultra Series 1 replaced Iris Xe with Arc-class Xe-LPG graphics, and the jump is real. A Core Ultra 5 125H carries seven Xe cores (roughly 112 execution-unit equivalent) at 2.2 GHz paired with DDR5-5600 or LPDDR5X-7467 memory; the Core Ultra 7 155H adds an eighth Xe core at 2.25 GHz. In ASUS NUC 14 Pro testing, a Core Ultra 5 configuration reached roughly 30 fps in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p Low — an entirely different outcome from an N100-class UHD iGPU, and enough to call this tier entry-level modern 1080p gaming.

Two caveats matter. Meteor Lake Arc depends on dual-channel memory, and ASUS explicitly requires two SO-DIMMs for the Arc configuration on the relevant NUC 14 Pro SKUs, so a one-DIMM barebone build performs well below the platform's ability. The platform is also now a generation behind, which makes it a value option rather than a current one. The ASUS NUC 14 Pro is the reference machine here: Check Price on Amazon.

Radeon 680M — Entry Gaming That Still Works

Radeon 680M is where an integrated mini PC becomes a genuine gaming option. It brings 12 RDNA 2 compute units and 768 shaders, running up to 2.2 GHz on the Ryzen 7 6800H and 7735HS and up to 2.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H, paired with dual-channel DDR5-4800 or LPDDR5-6400. That lands it in a 720p-to-1080p low/medium range for older AAA titles and esports.

By current standards the 680M sits in a value tier. Radeon 780M adds RDNA 3 and faster memory support, and Radeon 890M expands to 16 RDNA 3.5 compute units. A 680M mini PC makes sense when priced clearly below a 780M equivalent. On the GMKtec NucBox M7 Pro specifically, at least one owner has reported idle coil whine — a reported possibility on an individual unit, not a documented model-wide defect. Check Price on Amazon

Radeon 780M — The Current iGPU Sweet Spot

Radeon 780M is the tier to buy if you want a mini PC that games without qualifiers. It carries 12 RDNA 3 compute units and 768 shaders at up to 2.7 GHz, in the Ryzen 7 7840HS and 8845HS, backed by dual-channel DDR5-5600 or LPDDR5X-7500. That combination produces results no integrated mini PC reached a generation earlier: representative testing puts Cyberpunk 2077 around the high-30-fps range at 1080p Low, while lighter and highly optimized titles run far above 60 fps. In an independent GEEKOM A8 test, Fortnite measured roughly 76 fps at 1080p Medium with FSR and Warzone roughly 58 fps at 1080p Low.

Several machines define the tier, each with a different advantage:

• Beelink SER8 — a well-cooled 780M system with replaceable DDR5 SO-DIMMs and no OCuLink. Beelink markets a 65 W performance setting; independent stress testing measured roughly 54–58 W of sustained package power without obvious throttling. Check Price on Amazon
• GEEKOM A8 — a 780M system specified at a 45 W operating TDP with two DDR5-5600 SO-DIMM slots, and a lack of OCuLink as its main limitation for a future eGPU upgrade. Check Price on Amazon
• MINISFORUM UM890 Pro and GMKtec K8 Plus — 780M systems that add OCuLink PCIe 4.0 x4 on top of the same GPU, which for a gaming-first purchase matters far more than the small CPU differences between the 7840HS, 8845HS and 8945HS parts. Check Price on Amazon · Check Price on Amazon

Two clarifications worth internalizing. First, the 7840HS and 8845HS share the same 12-CU Radeon 780M at up to 2.7 GHz — a platform refresh, not a graphics-generation jump; the meaningful leaps are 680M to 780M and 780M to 890M. Second, if you want an OCuLink-capable 780M machine at clearance pricing, the older MINISFORUM UM780 XTX is worth watching specifically for that port rather than for its CPU Check Price on Amazon. MINISFORUM's MS-A1 takes a different route — an AM5 socket with a Ryzen 7 8700G providing Radeon 780M — but its storage-lane availability changes with the installed CPU, so it is not a uniform multi-drive platform Check Price on Amazon.

Radeon 890M — The Strongest iGPU Tier

Radeon 890M is the ceiling of integrated mini PC gaming. It expands to 16 RDNA 3.5 compute units and 1,024 shaders at up to 2.9 GHz in the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, paired with DDR5-5600 or LPDDR5X-8000. Benchmarks show both what that buys and what it does not: the ACEMAGIC F3A measured roughly 74 fps in GTA V at 1080p High and 57.7 fps in The Witcher 3 at 1080p High, but only 24.7 fps in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p Ultra with no FSR. The first two are comfortable; the third is the honest limit of an integrated GPU against a demanding current title at maximum settings.

Two buying notes. The 890M is already being refreshed: AMD's 2026 Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 keeps the same 16-CU Radeon 890M but raises the graphics clock to roughly 3.1 GHz and adds LPDDR5X-8533 support, so an HX 370 machine is still current-market hardware rather than obsolete. And the F3A's independently measured noise — roughly 32–36 dBA under load — shows an 890M system can stay quiet while holding power, a genuine advantage over larger discrete-GPU mini PCs.

Candidates: the ACEMAGIC F3A with Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, and the Beelink SER9 Pro, which pairs the same class of chip with soldered LPDDR5X-7500 memory. Check Price on Amazon · Check Price on Amazon. The SER9 Pro's soldered memory is a deliberate trade: far more bandwidth than SO-DIMM DDR5, but no upgrade path, so capacity must be right at purchase.

Discrete-GPU and eGPU Systems — A Separate Class

Once a compact PC contains a laptop discrete GPU or connects to a desktop graphics card through OCuLink or Thunderbolt/USB4, the conversation shifts from "can an integrated GPU keep up" to thermals, acoustics, cost and serviceability.

An integrated mobile discrete GPU is the simpler route. The ACEMAGIC M1A / TANK 03 pairs a Core i9-12900H with a GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (8 GB GDDR6, 3,072 CUDA cores, up to roughly 115 W), which delivers genuine discrete-GPU gaming without an external dock — at the cost of a larger, more power-hungry and more expensive machine. Check Price on Amazon

An external GPU keeps the mini PC small and defers the graphics purchase. That path has its own rules, covered next.

Memory Configuration Is the Rule Buyers Break Most

Nothing in a mini PC's specification has as much leverage over gaming frame rate as the memory configuration, and nothing is misconfigured more often.

An integrated GPU has no dedicated VRAM in the discrete sense. It reserves and dynamically shares system RAM, so the memory bus it reads through is a direct limit on graphics performance. A single DDR5 channel at 4800 MT/s moves about 38.4 GB/s, so dual-channel DDR5-4800 delivers roughly 76.8 GB/s. At DDR5-5600 the figures rise to 44.8 GB/s per channel and about 89.6 GB/s dual-channel — a 16.7% theoretical bandwidth advantage. That advantage does not translate into a flat 16.7% frame-rate gain; the improvement is game-dependent. But the single-channel-to-dual-channel step is different in kind, because it can double available bandwidth.

The practical rules:

• Populate both channels. In a replaceable-RAM mini PC, a matched 2×16 GB kit is normally a better gaming purchase than a single 1×32 GB module, even though capacity is identical. A 1×32 GB configuration leaves half the memory bandwidth unused.
• Do not read "16 GB" as dual-channel. A single 1×16 GB module on a two-channel platform is the worst of both — limited capacity and half the bandwidth. What matters is the two-module layout.
• Capacity and bandwidth are separate problems. Moving from 16 GB to 32 GB removes capacity pressure in recent titles. Moving from 32 GB to 64 GB or 96 GB rarely raises frame rate if the game already fits in memory.
• Verify what the platform supports. ASUS requires two SO-DIMMs for the Arc graphics configuration on relevant NUC 14 Pro SKUs, and dual-channel is equally important for Radeon 780M and 890M systems.
• Soldered LPDDR5X is the exception. A Beelink SER9 Pro has no memory upgrade path, but its LPDDR5X runs at a substantially higher data rate than SO-DIMM DDR5, which benefits the integrated GPU. The tradeoff is fixed capacity.

For replaceable-RAM systems, DDR5-5600 kits cover the sensible configurations: a 2×16 GB kit for most 780M builds Check Price on Amazon and a 2×32 GB kit when the same machine also serves as a workstation or virtualization host Check Price on Amazon. A 2×8 GB kit fills both channels on a tighter budget, though 16 GB total is restrictive for some modern AAA titles alongside background applications Check Price on Amazon.

Storage is a smaller lever, but a real one on two-M.2 systems: keeping the operating system and applications on one drive and a large game library on a second avoids contention. A PCIe 4.0 x4 drive such as the Samsung 990 PRO 2 TB will operate below its peak in a PCIe 3.0 slot, so match the drive to the host if the budget is tight. Check Price on Amazon

Sustained Power and Cooling Beat Wattage Labels

Integrated GPUs share a package power budget with the CPU, so how much power a system holds — and how well it cools — shapes frame rate as much as the GPU model. It also produces more confusion than any other specification.

Two systems can carry the same Radeon 780M and perform differently because one sustains 54 W and the other throttles at 35 W. The Beelink SER8 is a useful case: Beelink markets a 65 W performance setting, while an independent sustained package measurement landed closer to 54–58 W without obvious throttling. The second number is the one a gamer experiences.

Raising a platform's power ceiling helps, but not proportionally. Going from a 45 W profile to a 65–70 W profile does not produce a 44–55% frame-rate gain; the benefit shrinks once GPU clocks, memory bandwidth or another component becomes the limit. Vendor performance-mode terminology is also not always identical to AMD's official processor cTDP definition, so two listings advertising a "70 W mode" may not behave the same way.

Cooling sets the ceiling those power settings operate under. Representative sustained-load noise from independent testing gives a realistic picture:

Those figures are not directly comparable — different reviewers use different distances, backgrounds and workloads — but they show a well-designed iGPU mini PC holding the mid-30s dBA under sustained gaming load, quieter than most laptops under equivalent stress. Sustained stress testing also exposes the real thermal headroom: the UM890 Pro held roughly 79–80 °C after stabilisation in one test, and the A8 peaked near 89 °C. For a machine that will game for hours, that stability is worth more than a benchmark's first thirty seconds.

Display Output Specs Are Not Gaming Performance

Vendor pages advertise 4K at 120, 144 or 240 Hz, and 8K at 60 Hz. These describe what the display link can carry, not what the GPU can render — and the gap between the two is the most common source of disappointment in mini PC gaming.

A Radeon 780M can drive a 4K desktop at a high refresh rate while being best suited to rendering a demanding game at 1080p. An HDMI 2.1 output advertising 4K120 may still use the older TMDS signalling path and behave as a 4K60-class output. And an 8K cable does not make 8K gaming realistic, because cable bandwidth and rendering performance are unrelated.

The same logic applies to memory. Increasing a BIOS UMA frame-buffer reservation from 2 GB to 4, 8 or 16 GB does not create faster VRAM. It guarantees a larger pre-allocated region and can help titles that inspect the reported dedicated-video-memory figure before launching, but Windows can normally allocate additional shared system memory dynamically. "Set 16 GB VRAM for more FPS" is not a general performance tweak.

None of this makes high-bandwidth outputs useless. A DisplayPort 1.4 cable Check Price on Amazon or a certified 48 Gbps HDMI 2.1 cable Check Price on Amazon matters for connecting a high-refresh monitor or an external GPU correctly — it just does not change what the GPU renders. A Thunderbolt dock such as the CalDigit TS4 expands peripherals and host charging, but it is not an eGPU substitute, and routing a gaming monitor through a dock can introduce display-topology constraints that a direct connection avoids. Check Price on Amazon

OCuLink vs USB4 vs Thunderbolt for External GPUs

For a buyer who wants a small PC now and real gaming performance later, the external-GPU path is the enthusiast answer — and the connection type decides how much of the card you actually get.

OCuLink exposes a direct PCIe 4.0 x4 link with roughly 64 GT/s of raw signalling. Thunderbolt 3, Thunderbolt 4 and typical USB4 eGPU implementations tunnel PCIe over a 40 Gb/s transport instead. Across reviewer and community testing, a broad observed range is single-digit to low-teens percentage loss versus a directly attached desktop GPU for OCuLink, and roughly 15–30% for TB3/TB4/USB4, with larger penalties possible in bandwidth-sensitive or very high-frame-rate workloads. Those percentages are orientation, not specifications: GPU class, game, resolution and whether the image travels back across the cable all change the result.

One topology rule applies to every eGPU setup: connect the gaming monitor directly to the external GPU enclosure, not to the mini PC. Rendering on the eGPU and returning completed frames across the external link wastes the bandwidth you paid for.

Three products cover the practical range:

• MINISFORUM DEG1 — an open OCuLink PCIe 4.0 x4 dock that accepts a desktop graphics card and a separately supplied ATX/SFX power supply, with GPU and PSU not included. OCuLink is not hot-pluggable: power the system down before connecting or disconnecting. Check Price on Amazon
• GPD G1 — a self-contained eGPU with a fixed Radeon RX 7600M XT (8 GB GDDR6, 2,048 stream processors, 32 CUs, game clock around 2.3 GHz, boost around 2.615 GHz) over either OCuLink (about 63 Gb/s class) or USB4 (40 Gb/s). Owners generally prefer OCuLink where the host supports it and USB4 where convenience matters. Check Price on Amazon
• Razer Core X V2 — a Thunderbolt 5 enclosure with up to 80 Gb/s bidirectional connectivity, backward support for Thunderbolt 4 and supported USB4 hosts, roughly four-slot GPU support, up to 140 W host power delivery, and a separately supplied ATX PSU and GPU. Check Price on Amazon

Three caveats keep this honest. "USB4 40Gbps" describes a transport class, not a guarantee of identical tunneled-PCIe performance or flawless eGPU compatibility across vendors. OCuLink is fast but less appliance-like: it requires powering down before cable changes, and some owners report boot or display handshaking quirks on specific GPU and dock combinations. And spending heavily on an enclosure plus a desktop GPU can erase the price and space advantage that motivated buying a mini PC in the first place.

Mini PC vs Steam Deck, ROG Ally, PS5 and Xbox Series S

A buyer who only wants to game should compare the mini PC against the purpose-built alternatives before spending on one.

The Steam Deck OLED pairs a Zen 2 4-core/8-thread CPU and an 8-CU RDNA 2 GPU with 16 GB of high-bandwidth unified memory and a 1280×800 OLED panel at up to 90 Hz, in a roughly 4–15 W APU envelope. Its hardware, panel resolution, controls and software are designed together, which is why compute-unit counts should not be compared directly against a Windows mini PC. For a buyer whose only goal is gaming, the Deck can be the more coherent purchase. Check Price on Amazon

The ASUS ROG Ally X is architecturally close to a 780M mini PC — Ryzen Z1 Extreme, 8 cores/16 threads, 12 RDNA 3 compute units up to about 2.7 GHz, 24 GB LPDDR5X — but it integrates a 1920×1080 120 Hz VRR screen, controls and a battery at 9–30 W operating modes. It suits someone effectively trying to build a small Steam machine, while a mini PC wins on stationary connectivity, monitor flexibility, RAM and storage upgrades, and server or productivity roles. Check Price on Amazon

The consoles are the sharpest reality check. An Xbox Series S carries 20 RDNA 2 compute units at roughly 1.565 GHz (about 4 TFLOPS) with 10 GB of GDDR6, targeting up to 1440p and 120 fps modes where a game provides them. A PlayStation 5 pairs an 8-core/16-thread Zen 2-derived CPU with an RDNA-based GPU around the 10 TFLOPS class and 16 GB of GDDR6. At comparable total hardware budgets, a PS5 is generally a much stronger AAA-gaming proposition than an iGPU-only 780M mini PC. The mini PC earns its place when PC software, mods, emulation, general Windows or Linux use and productivity are part of the requirement. Check Price on Amazon · Check Price on Amazon

When a Mini PC Is the Wrong Buy

• Your library is dominated by demanding current AAA titles at high or maximum settings. A discrete-GPU desktop or a PS5 does that better for the money.
• You are buying at the N100/N150 tier expecting modern gaming. Those systems cannot be upgraded into gaming machines: the memory controller is single-channel and the GPU has 24 execution units.
• Gaming is your only use case and portability is not required. A console or a full desktop is the more rational budget.
• You want a zero-configuration appliance. External-GPU setups require powering down for cable changes and can need BIOS or driver troubleshooting.
• You need maximum performance per dollar. A conventional gaming desktop remains easier to cool, service and upgrade, and its graphics card can simply be replaced.

Buy a mini PC when compact size, low idle power, quiet operation and general-purpose computing matter alongside gaming — and when the games you play sit inside the tier you are paying for.

Frequently Asked Questions

Conclusion

Mini PCs game well when the graphics tier matches the library, and poorly when it does not. The specification that decides the outcome is the GPU — not the CPU badge, not the RAM total, and not the display-output figure.

Radeon 780M is the point at which an integrated mini PC becomes a credible 1080p gaming computer, Radeon 890M raises the ceiling without reaching discrete-GPU territory, and Intel N100/N150 systems are excellent small servers and office machines that should not be bought for modern gaming. External GPUs and integrated laptop discrete GPUs sit in a separate class that can approach desktop performance, at the cost of complexity, noise and money.

Whatever you choose, configure the memory correctly, confirm the exact SKU, and match the tier to the games you actually play rather than the ones a spec sheet implies. If you are building a 780M system from a barebone, start with a matched DDR5-5600 kit. Check Price on Amazon

Related reading:

• Best mini PCs for gaming
• N100 mini PC complete buying guide
• Best mini PC for HTPC and home theater
• Best mini PC for video editing
• Best mini PC for Proxmox